Abstract
This article challenges the long-standing consensus that Cicero presents a basically Aristotelian account of political community in Rep. 1.39‐41. Based on a philosophical and philological analysis of the extant evidence, it is argued that Cicero’s account rather appears like a conscious rejection of Aristotle’s distinctive views. Both linguistically and philosophically Scipio’s account looks far more germane to Polybius’ account in Hist. 6 as well as the main tenets of Stoic political philosophy. Cicero’s original and critical adaptation of their ideas stands out for its fascinating conception of law/justice as a natural source of social cohesion and its distinctive call for political leadership as a force for both moral and material good.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | History of Political Thought |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 27-59 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| ISSN | 0143-781X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
- MLA